That's not logical reasoning, that's merely a fact derived inductively from everyday observations.
No, it's simply definition.
Again, the first law of thermodynamics is a "law" which describes everyday experiences within our own universe at the present epoch. But Big Bangs are not everyday in-universe events.
I've heard this one too, and if there ever was a weak objection to something, this is it. It amounts to: physics is worthless.
as there's plenty who will tell you the universe was belched out of the belly of a giant porpoise.
Your ignorance is showing and it's embarrassing. The mystical experience is remarkably consistent.
What do you mean by this? To my mind, some definition of "the mystical experience" may be internally consistent, but I highly doubt what you're hinting at makes any testable claims.
No, it's simply definition.
Again, the first law of thermodynamics is a "law" which describes everyday experiences within our own universe at the present epoch. But Big Bangs are not everyday in-universe events.
I've heard this one too, and if there ever was a weak objection to something, this is it. It amounts to: physics is worthless.
as there's plenty who will tell you the universe was belched out of the belly of a giant porpoise.
Your ignorance is showing and it's embarrassing. The mystical experience is remarkably consistent.